Parent emailed asking why I let students use ChatGPT at all
got a long email last night from a parent upset that i allow structured chatgpt use in my classroom at all, framed as basically letting kids cheat with extra steps. spent an hour last night writing back a calm explanation of the difference between banned use and structured supervised use with documentation requirements, plus a bit about how the provincial and board level guidance actually supports this approach. havent heard back yet. this is the first parent pushback ive gotten since i started being more open about ai integration two years ago and honestly it kind of rattled me even though i know my policy is solid. anyone have a good template or approach for parent communication about ai policy before the school year gets further along, would rather be proactive than reactive after more of these emails.
200 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.
@Angela Castillo love that idea, going to draft something similar this weekend before more emails like this one show up.
as a vp id also recommend looping your department head or admin into any parent communication template before it goes out school wide, gives you institutional backing if a parent escalates past the individual teacher level, which does happen more than people expect.
tested walter writes ai on one of my own responses to a similar parent email once just to see how it read to an outside tool, mostly out of curiosity rather than necessity. wasnt really the point though, the actual fix here is proactive communication like angela's suggesting, not a tool.
THANK YOU for asking this because i needed the same template. the faq approach angela mentioned plus looping in admin like ray suggested seems like the strongest combination here, proactive, backed by the school, and addresses the specific cheating with extra steps framing directly instead of dancing around it. going to combine both pieces for my own letter home this week.
YES sending a proactive letter home in the first two weeks is exactly what worked for me last year! i included a short faq addressing the cheating with extra steps concern directly since i knew it would come up eventually anyway.