My Student Used ChatGPT on Their Essay. Now What?
So it happened. You’re pretty sure a student used ChatGPT for a major assignment. Maybe the writing style is completely different from their usual work. Maybe the AI detector flagged it. Maybe they even admitted it. What do you do next?
First, take a breath. This isn’t the same as catching a student cheating on a test. The landscape is new and the rules are evolving. How you handle this sets a precedent.
Start by having a private conversation with the student. Don’t come in accusatory. Instead, ask open-ended questions about their writing process. “Walk me through how you wrote this.” “What was your main argument and why?” If they can’t discuss their own paper coherently, that tells you more than any detector ever could.
Check your school’s policy. Many schools have updated their academic integrity policies to address AI, but some haven’t. If there’s no specific policy on AI use, you’re in tricky territory. Applying traditional plagiarism penalties might not be appropriate or supported by administration.
Consider the severity. Did the student generate the entire essay with AI, or did they use it as a starting point and do significant work of their own? These are different situations that probably warrant different responses.
Think about what you want the outcome to be. Is the goal to punish, or to help the student learn? In most cases, I’ve found that a conversation about why the assignment exists and what skills it’s meant to develop is more productive than a zero in the gradebook.
For repeat situations or more egregious cases, follow your school’s disciplinary process. Document everything, including your conversation with the student and any evidence you collected.
Going forward, consider redesigning assignments to make AI use less tempting. Personal reflection, class-specific discussions, process-based portfolios, and in-class writing components all help.
How has your school handled these situations? What’s worked and what hasn’t?
6 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
The policy framework outlined here is sound. I would suggest one addition: include students in the policy development process. When we involved our student council in drafting our AI guidelines, compliance improved significantly. Students are more likely to follow rules they helped create, and they often identify edge cases that adults miss.
I think there's a danger in moving too far in the permissive direction. There's still value in students struggling through the writing process independently. That struggle is where deep learning happens. If we make it too easy to use AI at every stage, we risk producing students who can manage AI tools but can't think independently.
i brought up the false positive issue at a staff meeting and got told to 'trust the technology.' this is the same admin that can't figure out how to unmute on zoom
the spectrum thing is spot on. its not black and white no matter how much admin wants it to be
our admin wants us to use AI detection but also told us we can't accuse students based on detection results. so what exactly is the point? just flag it and then do nothing?