New Turnitin update this fall, better or worse for you so far

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.

three weeks of tracking is a decent start but i'd want at least a full term before drawing conclusions about the pattern by length, assignment topic and student population could easily be confounding what you're seeing. that said, the short assignment improvement lines up with what a couple colleagues at my school have mentioned informally too, so there might be something real there. keep tracking and if the longer essay pattern holds through november i'd actually want to see the data.

had one of those longer essay false flags myself last week, kid wrote almost 2000 words for a personal narrative assignment and got an 68% ai score. i know this student, i know her writing, there's zero chance ai wrote that. felt like deja vu from last year honestly.

at some point don't we have to admit these tools just aren't reliable enough for anything beyond a loose signal? every update seems to trade one problem for another, fewer false positives here, more there. i've mostly stopped trusting the score itself and just use it as a reason to look closer, nothing more.

Daniel, fair, i'll keep tracking through november and report back with a bigger sample. Isabelle's point about using it as a reason to look closer rather than a verdict is basically where i've landed too.