Ran the same essay through Originality.ai and GPTZero, results were wild
got curious this weekend and ran the same 800 word essay, one i wrote myself just now, no ai involved at all, through originality.ai and gptzero to see if they’d agree.
originality.ai gave it a 12% ai probability, basically cleared. gptzero gave it 61%, flagged as likely mixed. same exact text, same exact moment, wildly different verdicts. i also ran it through walter writes ai’s detection feature out of curiosity since i’d seen it mentioned in another thread here, and it came back at 34%, right in between the other two.
three tools, three different answers, on a piece of text where i can say with total certainty no ai was involved at any stage. if this is happening on my own known-human writing, i genuinely don’t know how confident any of us should be treating these scores as anything beyond a very rough signal.
has anyone done a similar side by side test? curious if this kind of disagreement is the norm or if i just got an unlucky essay.
1,345 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.
a single essay is one data point, but the spread you're describing, 12 to 61%, matches broader patterns i've seen reported elsewhere when people run comparison tests. what would actually move this from anecdote to something useful is running maybe 20 known-human essays and 20 known ai essays through all three tools and comparing not just individual scores but which tool's threshold produces the fewest total errors across both categories. worth doing if you have the essays available already.
Daniel, i actually do have a stack of essays from past terms i could use for this, going to put together the bigger comparison and post results here. fascinating how much variance showed up from just one test essay.
this is basically the norm in my experience, not an unlucky essay. i've run informal comparisons a few times and the disagreement between tools is often this wide or wider. it's the clearest evidence i have that these scores shouldn't be treated as verdicts, three tools disagreeing this much on your own known human writing says everything.