The Student Perspective on AI Bans – From Someone Who Remembers Being One
graduated 4 years ago so i’m maybe the closest person in this thread to the student experience. first year teaching now.
when i was in school the ban was on phones. we put them in our pockets instead of on our desks. that was the whole impact of the ban. we used them more secretly, which made us less transparent about what we were actually doing.
i think AI bans work exactly the same way. the students who weren’t going to use it for cheating continue not using it. the students who were going to cheat use it more secretly and less disclosably. you’ve added friction to legitimate users and achieved nothing against the people the policy was aimed at.
the schools that had phone integration policies – not phone bans – had better outcomes because at least you knew what was happening.
am i wrong about this? i’d genuinely like to hear from teachers who feel a ban worked.
4 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
The student perspective matters and your experience tracks with what we found when we involved our student council in policy development. When students had a voice in writing the policy, compliance went up substantially - not because the policy was more permissive, but because students understood the reasoning and felt it was fair. Top-down bans create adversarial dynamics. Collaborative policies create shared responsibility.
the student perspective you're describing confirms something I've been saying for a while: bans signal institutional anxiety rather than institutional values. when we ban a tool without explaining the underlying principle, students learn to hide - not to think. a clear values-based policy that says "here's what we care about and why" gets more genuine engagement than a prohibition.
every student I've talked to says the same thing: they'd rather know the actual rule than guess and get caught. the ambiguity isn't protecting academic integrity, its just producing anxiety and risk-calculation.
THANK YOU for saying what I've been thinking. tried a full semester ban. students got sneakier. that's the whole result. and I lost the ability to have honest conversations about how they were using AI because the policy made transparency risky for them.