International students getting flagged way more than domestic students, anyone else seeing this
i teach a first year writing course with a large international student population, probably 60% of my roster this term. i pulled our detection flag data from the first month, informally, just going through my own gradebook notes, and international students are flagged at almost three times the rate of domestic students.
i don’t think this means international students are cheating more. i think it means the detection tools are calibrated for a kind of english that doesn’t match how many of these students were taught to write, often more formal, more structured, closer to textbook english than casual native speaker prose.
the scale of this is what worries me. with class sizes this large i can’t have an individual conversation with every flagged student the way i could with a smaller class. has anyone built a process that works at scale for this, not just for one or two cases but for dozens across a term?
1,626 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.
no policy is a policy. if your department hasn't set a rule for handling this at scale, you're each making it up individually every time, and that's worse for everyone including the students.
also worth saying out loud, the students most likely to get flagged are often the ones with the least institutional power to push back on it. international students on visas have real stakes if an academic integrity case goes sideways, way more than a domestic student does. that should raise the bar for how careful we are before escalating anything.
Holly, the early writing sample idea is smart and actually doable at my scale, going to set that up for winter term. Mackenzie's point about stakes for international students is something i want to bring to our department chair directly.
the ratio you're describing matches published research pretty closely, some studies put international and ESL student false positive rates at two to three times domestic rates depending on the tool. at scale, the only thing i've seen work reliably is moving the verification step earlier in the process, a short in class writing sample early in the term that you can compare voice and style against later, rather than reacting to each flag individually after the fact.