Wrote our class AI policy together with students, sharing how it went
tried something different this term. instead of handing students an ai policy i wrote myself, i spent two class periods building it together with them, small groups drafted sections and we voted on language as a class.
the process itself taught me more than i expected. students were way more nuanced than i assumed they’d be, several groups actually argued for stricter rules on undisclosed use than i would have written myself, but also pushed for more flexibility around brainstorming and outlining stages. one student made a point that stuck with me, that a policy written entirely by adults about a technology students understand more intimately than most teachers do was always going to feel disconnected from how they actually use it.
the final policy is more detailed than anything i’ve seen from admin, and so far compliance seems higher than previous years, though its early to say for sure. has anyone else tried co-writing a policy with students rather than just presenting one? curious if the buy in effect holds up over a full term.
1,195 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.
i wonder if this is the closest thing to getting the cell phone ban conversation right the first time. so many phone policies failed because they were imposed without student input and then enforcement became this constant battle. if co-writing produces genuine buy in the way you're describing, it might be the model other AI policy questions should follow too.
THANK YOU for sharing this, i've been thinking for a while that our top down policy at my school feels disconnected from students but couldn't articulate why. the student's comment about intimacy with the technology names it exactly.
@Nadia Brosseau that phrase, disengaged compliance, is exactly what i saw in previous years without realizing what to call it. going to keep tracking this over the term and share an update in november.
this resonates deeply with something i believe strongly, that rules students help write are rules students actually understand the reasoning behind, not just the letter of. the student comment you shared about adults writing policy for a technology students understand more intimately captures exactly why so many top down policies fail quietly, not through rebellion but through a kind of disengaged compliance that doesn't hold up under pressure.