British Columbia curriculum update mentions AI literacy explicitly, first province to do this?
noticed bc quietly updated some curriculum language this year to explicitly reference ai literacy as a competency area within the existing digital literacy framework, rather than leaving it as an implicit assumption teachers had to interpret on their own. not a massive overhaul, more of an addition to existing language, but its the first time ive seen a province name it directly in official curriculum documents rather than just guidance memos. curious if other provinces have done something similar that i havent heard about yet, and if bc teachers here have actually seen this trickle down into anything concrete at the classroom level yet or if its still mostly document language without much practical change.
365 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.
@Raj Deepak fair question honestly and i dont have a confident answer yet, its recent enough that i havent seen the pd rollout to go with it. give it time i suppose, curriculum language usually precedes actual classroom change by a year or two in my experience.
from the admin side curriculum language matters more than people think even without immediate funding attached, because it gives principals and department heads something official to point to when justifying pd budget requests or assessment redesign time. its a lever, just a slow one.
academically speaking this kind of curriculum naming usually shows up in research a couple years later as a natural experiment, comparing outcomes in provinces that named ai literacy explicitly versus those that left it implicit. worth watching for that kind of study down the line.
dumb question probably but does naming it in curriculum actually change anything without funding or pd attached? feels like it could just become another line item nobody has time to actually implement.